Formation Of the Commissioner Judge Institution as A Court Supervision Policy (Judicial Scrutiny) Indonesian Criminal Justice System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61487/jssbs.v2i4.110Keywords:
commissioned judge institution, court supervision (judicial scrutiny), criminal justice systemAbstract
The idea of the concept of commissioner judges as Preliminary Examination Judge Institutions is the influence of the development of the times, as well as the ratification of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights by Indonesia, so that protection of the rights of suspects/defendants becomes the country's main priority in efforts to enforce the law through law enforcement officers. The fundamental function of Criminal Procedure Law is to seek material truth, so it is felt that the Preliminary Examination Judge as a new institution that emerged in the Criminal Procedure Code Bill is a new breakthrough to maintain the Due Process of Law so that it can continue to run according to expectations. It is also hoped that in the future there will be no innocent people who are sentenced without ignoring the interests of the victim. This scientific writing uses the Sociological Legal Research method (socio legal research).
References
Abdulkadir, Muhammad. (2004). Law and Legal Research. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Abdullah, Said. (2017). Some Notes on the Formulation Policy in Law Number 8 of 1981 Concerning the Criminal Procedure Code. Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum, 5(2), 124–138.
Adha, Noor Ichwan Ichlas Ria. (2015). Commissioner Judge (Appreciation of the Criminal Procedure Law Regulation). Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 4(3), 443–462.
Afandi, Fachrizal. (2016). Comparison of Pretrial Practices and the Formation of Commissioner Judges in Indonesian Criminal Justice. OLD WEBSITE OF JURNAL MIMBAR HUKUM, 28(1), 93–106.
Akbar, Andi, RR Dijan Widijowari, and Kristiawanto. (2023). Legal Certainty of Pre-Trial Suspect Determination in the Criminal Justice System in Indonesia. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspective Studies, 23(1), 1–10.
Ariska, Dudung Indra. (2019). Legal Reform of the Criminal Justice System in the Draft Law on the Criminal Procedure Code. Yustitia, 5(1), 78–89.
Banakar, Reza, and Max Travers. (2005). Theory and Method in Socio-Legal Research. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Bibikova, Marharyta O. (2022). Procedural Guidance on Pre-Trial Investigation: International Experience and National Realities. Naukovij vìsnik Nacìonalʹnoï akademìï vnutrìšnìh sprav, 27(1). https://lawscience.com.ua/en/journals/tom-27-1-2022/zdiysnennya-prokurorom-protsesualnogo-kerivnitstva-dosudovim-rozs liduvannyam-mizhnarodny-dosvid-i-natsionalni-realiyi.
Boyne, Shawn Marie. (2016). Chapter 6: Procedural Economy in Pre-Trial Procedure: Developments in Germany and the United States. https://www.elgaronline.com/edcollchap/edcoll/9781781007181/ 9781781007181.00016.xml.
Cantigi, Tiffany Gusni Ayu. (2022). Reforming Indonesian Criminal Procedure Law Through the Establishment of Judge Commissioners. Tambusai Education Journal, 6(2), 12342–12355.
Copp, Jennifer E., William Casey, Thomas G. Blomberg, and George Pesta. (2022). Pretrial Risk Assessment Instruments in Practice: The Role of Judicial Discretion in Pretrial Reform. Criminology & Public Policy, 21(2), 329–358.
Dandurand, Yvon. (2014). Criminal Justice Reform and the System’s Efficiency. Criminal Law Forum, 25(3), 383–440.
Dobbie, Will, Jacob Goldin, and Crystal S. Yang. (2018). The Effects of Pretrial Detention on Conviction, Future Crime, and Employment: Evidence from Randomly Assigned Judges. American Economic Review, 108(2), 201–240.
Faisal, Fitriah. (2023). Due Process of Law: Pre-Trial and Preliminary Examination Judge on Indonesian Criminal Procedure Law. Scholars International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 6(03), 154–158.
———. Pre-Trial in Indonesia: Why It Should Be Reformed. Jurisprudentie: Department of Law, Faculty of Sharia and Law, 10(2), 70–80.
Fani, Ryan. (2021). The Urgency of Pre-Trial Institutions in Indonesia as a Permanent Institution Obliged to Conduct a Preliminary Examination Before the Case is Referred to the Court. Wacana Paramarta: Journal of Legal Studies, 20(4), 14–27.
Felisiano, Iqbal, and Amira Paripurna. (2023). Implementation of restorative justice and loopholes for corrupt practices. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 9(1), 135–145.
Foudray, Chelsea M. A., and Evan M. Lowder. (n.d.) Judicial Decision-Making in the Era of Pretrial Reform. Psychology, Crime & Law, 1–28.
Hikmawati, Puteri. (2020). The Existence of Commissioner Judges in Criminal Justice System (an Analysis on Criminal Procedure Bill).
Huda, Aldifa Fahrul, Noviriska Noviriska, and Lukman Hakim. (2024). Legal Protection of the Rights of Suspects Whose Investigation Orders Were Canceled Through Pretrial Decisions (Case Decision Number: 67/PID.PRAP/2015/PN.JKT.SEL.). Jurnal Review Pendidikan dan Pengajar (JRPP), 7(1), 760–775.
Irawati, Arista Candra. (2024). The Formal Criminal Law Renewal: Due Process of Law in Pre-Trial for Legal Assurance. Atlantis Press. https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/icleh-22/125985862.
Kharis, Alvan. (2023). Assessing Pre-Trial Jurisdiction and the Concept of Rechter Commissioner in the Draft Law on the Criminal Code. Criminal Procedure Law. Lakidende Law Review, 2(2), 415–425.
Moeliono, Tristam P., and Widati Wulandari. (2015). Asas Legalitas Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana: Kritikan Terhadap Putusan MK Tentang Praperadilan. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 22(4), 594–616.
Noor, Afif. (2023). Socio-Legal Research: Integration of Normative and Empirical Juridical Research in Legal Research. Jurnal Ilmiah Dunia Hukum, 7(2), 94–112.
Nugroho, Hernawan Satrio. (2024). Kewenangan Lembaga Pengadilan Dalam Menetapkan Sah Atau Tidaknya Status Tersangka Kasus Korupsi Di Sidang Praperadilan. Verstek, 8(1). Accessed August 27, 2024. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/verstek/article/view/39622.
Panjaitan, Ananda Chrisna D. (2022). Ambivalensi Kedudukan Dan Fungsi Penyidikan Hakim Komisaris Di RUU KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM ACARA PIDANA Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Pamator: Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Trunojoyo, 15(2), 154–169.
———. (2024). Optimalisasi Peran Pihak Ketiga Yang Berkepentingan Dalam Praperadilan Melalui Penegakan Hukum Menuju Pembaharuan Hukum Acara Pidana. Ex Aequo Et Bono Journal of Law, 1(2). Accessed August 27, 2024. https://journal-iasssf.com/index.php/ EAEBJOL/article/view/294.
Pasaribu, Johannes, Alvi Syahrin, and M Ekaputra. (2018). Peranan Jaksa Terkait Asas Dominus Litis Berdasarkan Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia.
Pattiruhu, Fransina, Salmun Adu, and Jeremia Alexander Wewo. (2020). Analisis Terhadap Perkara Praperadilan Yang Tidak Dinyatakan Gugur Sesuai Putusan Makhamah Konstitusi. JATISWARA, 3(1). Accessed August 27, 2024. https://www.jatiswara.unram.ac.id/index.php/js/ article/view/235.
Qurniawan, Ari, Murdian, and Anggraini. (2022). Strengthening the Function of Prejudicial Institutions and the Implementation Concept of the Judges Institution of Commissioners in the Protection of Suspects Rights. Atlantis Press, 150–157. https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/ulicoss-21/125968277.
Reksodiputro, Mardjono. (2010). Rekonstruksi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Lex Specialist, 11, 1–10.
Rettob, Abdul Gafur. (2021). Eksistensi Sema Nomor 1 Tahun 2018 Dalam Mewujudkan Keadilan Masyarakat Terkait Permohonan Praperadilan Bagi Tersangka Yang Melarikan Diri Atau Sedang Dalam Status Daftar Pencarian Orang. Mimbar Hukum, 33(1), 281–314.
Santoso, Bambang, Hartiwiningsih, and Muhammad Rustamaji. (2021). Reconstruction of the Pretrial Regulation in Code of Criminal Procedure in the Framework of Law Enforcement Reflecting Inclusive Law. Atlantis Press, 68–72. https://www.atlantis-press.com/procee dings/iceep-21/125961561.
Sari, Devi Kartika. (2015). Analisis Yuridis Kedudukan Hakim Komisaris Sebagai Upaya Pembaharuan Lembaga Praperadilan Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia. Brawijaya Law Student Journal. https://hukum.studentjournal.ub.ac.id /index.php/hukum/article/view/1005.
Sebayang, Sahri. “Praperadilan Sebagai S Nugroho, Hernawan Satrio. (2020). The Authority of the Court in Determining the Validity or Invalidity of the Status of a Corruption Case Suspect in a Pretrial Hearing. Verstek, 8(1). Accessed August 27, 2024. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/verstek/article/view/39622.
Panjaitan, Ananda Chrisna D. (2022). The Ambivalence of the Position and Function of the Commissioner Judge’s Investigation in the Draft Law on the Criminal Procedure Code in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System. Pamator Journal: Scientific Journal of Trunojoyo University, 15(2), 154–169.
———. (2024). Optimizing the Role of Interested Third Parties in Pretrial Through Law Enforcement Towards Reforming Criminal Procedure Law. Ex Aequo Et Bono Journal of Law, 1(2). Accessed August 27, 2024. https://journal-iasssf.com/index.php/ EAEBJOL/article/view/294.
Pasaribu, Johannes, Alvi Syahrin, and M Ekaputra. (2018). The Role of Prosecutors Related to the Principle of Dominus Litis Based on the Criminal Justice System in Indonesia.
Pattiruhu, Fransina, Salmun Adu, and Jeremia Alexander Wewo. (2020). Analysis of Pretrial Cases That Are Not Declared Dismissed According to the Decision of the Constitutional Court. JATISWARA, 35(1). Accessed August 27, 2024. https://www.jatiswara.unram.ac.id/index.php/js/ article/view/235.
Qurniawan, Ari, Murdian, and Anggraini. (2022). Strengthening the Function of Prejudicial Institutions and the Implementation Concept of the Judges Institution of Commissioners in the Protection of Suspects Rights. Atlantis Press, 150–157. https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/ulicoss-21/125968277.
Reksodiputro, Mardjono. (2010). Reconstruction of the Indonesian Criminal Justice System. Lex Specialist, 11, 1–10.
Rettob, Abdul Gafur. (2021). The Existence of Sema Number 1 of 2018 in Realizing Community Justice Regarding Pretrial Applications for Suspects Who Have Escaped or Are on the Wanted List. Mimbar Hukum, 33(1), 281–314.
Santoso, Bambang, Hartiwiningsih, and Muhammad Rustamaji. (2021). Reconstruction of the Pretrial Regulation in Code of Criminal Procedure in the Framework of Law Enforcement Reflecting Inclusive Law. Atlantis Press, 68–72. https://www.atlantis-press.com/procee dings/iceep-21/125961561.
Sari, Devi Kartika. (2015). Legal Analysis of the Position of Commissioner Judges as an Effort to Renew Pretrial Institutions in the Criminal Justice System in Indonesia. Brawijaya Law Student Journal. https://hukum.studentjournal.ub.ac.id /index.php/hukum/article/view/1005.
Sebayang, Sahri. (2020). Pretrial as an Effort to Protect the Rights of Suspects in Examination at the Investigation Level (Study of the Medan District Court). Jurnal Hukum Kaidah: Media Komunikasi dan Informasi Hukum dan Masyarakat, 19(2), 329–383.
Situmeang, Sahat Maruli Tua. (2021). Presence of Pretrial in the Perspective of the Pancasila State of Law. LAW REFORM, 17(2), 183–200.
Situmeang, Sahat Maruli Tua. (2021). Presence of Pretrial in the Perspective of the Pancasila State of Law. LAW REFORM, 17(1), 183–200.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dwi Nurahman, Maroni Maroni, A. Irzal Fardiansyah, Muhammad Akib, HS. Tisnanta
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
