Why Consumers Choose Counterfeits: An Integrated Model of Psychological and Social Determinants

https://doi.org/10.61487/jssbs.v3i4.204

Authors

  • Bernadin Dwi Mardiatmi Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jakarta
  • Maria Assumpta Wikantari Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jakarta
  • Pusporini Pusporini Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jakarta
  • Jenji Gunaedi Argo Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jakarta
  • Mutia Khoerunisa Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jakarta

Keywords:

purchase decision, consumer behavior, counterfeit products

Abstract

Counterfeit consumption has become a global issue that undermines intellectual property rights, damages brand equity, and influences consumer behavior across markets. This study aims to analyze the behavioral characteristics influencing consumers’ purchase decisions for counterfeit products, particularly within the Indonesian context. Using the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), Self-Determination Theory (SDT), Neutralization Theory, and Perceived Value Theory as analytical frameworks, the research investigates how attitudes, social influence, novelty seeking, status consumption, brand consciousness, perceived risk, and personal integrity shape purchase intentions. A quantitative survey of 240 Indonesian consumers who have purchased or been exposed to counterfeit products was conducted, and data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) via SmartPLS 4.0. The findings reveal that attitude, social influence, novelty seeking, and brand consciousness have significant positive effects on counterfeit purchase intention, while perceived risk and integrity exhibit weaker or negative effects. Awareness mediates these relationships, reducing purchase likelihood when ethical and legal knowledge is high. The study contributes theoretically by extending TPB with psychological and social-value constructions and offers managerial implications for policy, education, and anti-counterfeiting strategies.  

References

A-CAPP Center. (2023). Global Anti-Counterfeiting Consumer Survey 2023. Michigan State University. https://a-capp.msu.edu/article/global-anti-counterfeiting-consumer-survey-2023

Adnan. (2018). Pengaruh Perilaku Konsumen terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Susu Morinaga di Kota Lhokseumawe. Jurnal Visioner & Strategis, 7(2), 1-9.

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.

Arif, D., Pramestie, D. A., Maarif, U., & Latif, H. (2021). Marketplace Shopee Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Di Umaha. Jurnal Ecopreneur, 4(2), 172–178.

Avcı, İ. (2024). The effect of materialism, conspicuous consumption and sense of shame on intention to purchase counterfeit products and the mediating role of attitude. Current Research in Social Sciences, 10(1), 92–107.

Corsearch. (2024). Trade in counterfeit goods market set to reach USD 1.79 trillion in 2030. https://corsearch.com/about/press-releases/trade-in-counterfeit-goods-market-set-to-reach-1-79-trillion-in-2030

Detiknews. (2019). Gen Z Indonesia Mulai Jauhi Barang KW. https://news.detik.com/abcaustralia/d-4598169/gen-z-indonesia-mulai-jauhi-barang-kw

Dewanto, A. C., Moniharapon, S., & Mandagie, Y. (2018). The Influence Of Culture, Social, Personal, And Psychological To Yamaha Motorcycle Purchasing Decision (Study On The Faculty Of Economics And Business Of The University Of Sam Ratulangi Manado. Jurnal EMBA, 6(3), 1878-1887

Dhestantya, D. (2018). Pengaruh Beauty Vlogger Suhay Salim Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Wardah. Skripsi. Program Studi Ilmu Komunikasi. Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik. Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa. Banten

Dian, M. (2018). Generasi Millennial Gemar Membeli Produk Fashion Bekas? Ini Alasannya. Https://Www.Liputan6.Com/Lifestyle/Read/3335741/Generasi-Millennial-Gemar-Membeli-Produk-Fashion-Bekas-Ini-Alasannya

Ernawati, R., Dwi, A. B., & Argo, J. G. (2021). Analisis Pengaruh Promosi , Harga , dan Citra Merek terhadap Keputusan Pembelian pada Situs E-commerce Zalora di Jakarta. Business Management Analysis Journal, 4(2), 200–218, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24176/bmaj.v4i2.6663

Fahlevi, R., Giorgyna, G., & Sinambela, F. A. (2024). Analysis of factors influencing purchase intention of counterfeit handbags. Jurnal Fokus Manajemen Bisnis, 14(1), 32–53.

Firdaus, S., & Soepatini, E. (2024). The internalisation of counterfeit consumption behaviour from the lens of self-determination theory. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(3)

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). SAGE.

Hawkins, D. I., & Mothersbaugh, D. L. (2010). Consumer Behavior: Building Marketing Strategy. 11th edition. Irwin: McGraw-Hill

Hudani, A. (2020). Pengaruh Faktor Budaya, Faktor Sosial, Dan Faktor Pribadi Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian. Entrepreneurship Bisnis Manajemen Akuntansi (E-Bisma). 1(2), 99-107, DOI: https://doi.org/10.37631/e-bisma.v1i2.195

Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2009). Manajemen Pemasaran (13th ed). Jakarta: Erlangga

Lamb, C. W., Hair, J. F., & McDaniel, C. D. (2001). Marketing. Thomson Learning

Mayasari, I., Haryanto, H. C., Wiadi, I., Wijanarko, A. A., & Abdillah, W. (2022). Counterfeit purchase intention of fashion brands: The personal values and social aspect of consumers as determinants. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 24(1), 1–24.

MIAP. (2023). Annual Report on Counterfeiting in Indonesia. Jakarta: Masyarakat Indonesia Anti Pemalsuan.

Mowen, J., & Minor, M. (2007). Perilaku Konsumen, edisi kedelapan, Jilid 1. Jakarta: PT. Penerbit Erlangga

OECD & EUIPO. (2024). Global trade in fake goods: Trends and impacts 2024. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Phau, I., Sequeira, M., & Dix, S. (2009). Consumers’ willingness to knowingly purchase counterfeit products. Direct Marketing: An International Journal, 3(4), 262–281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/175059309110 00865

Pintor, S., & Sihombing, S. O. (2023). Predicting intention to purchase counterfeit products: Extending the theory of planned behavior. International Research Journal of Business Studies, 16(1), 1–15.

Purwaningrum, D. N. (2020). Pengaruh Faktor Sosial, Budaya, Pribadi, Psikologis Dan Pengetahuan Produk Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Whitening Lotion Tanpa BPOM di Kota Madiun. Prosiding (Seminar Inovasi Manajemen Bisnis dan Akuntansi). Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis. Universitas PGRI Madiun.

Samaddar, K., Mondal, S., & Gandhi, A. (2024). Online counterfeit purchase behaviour: Moderating effect of perceived anonymity and moral disengagement. Young Consumers, 25(1), 84–108.

Sangadji, E.M., & Sopiah. (2013). Perilaku Konsumen: Pendekatan Praktis Disertai: Himpunan Jurnal Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi.

Suryani, T. (2012). Perilaku Konsumen Implikasi pada Strategi Pemasaran. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu

Suwarti, E. & Rokhmah, B. E. (2018). Analisis Faktor - Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Keputusan Pembelian Sepatu Adidas Imitasi. Jurnal Riset Manajemen & Akuntansi,9(1), 14-26, DOI: https://doi.org/10.36600/rma.v9i1.60

Syahputra, I. (2019). Media Relations. Teori, Strategi, Praktik dan Media Inteligent. Depok: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sykes, G. M., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 664–670.

Tamara, T. (2019). Sebuan Produk Imitasi sebagai Ancaman Dunia Internasional. https://www.kompasiana.com/tatamara/5c8b18b63ba7f73713091bc2/produkimitasi? page=all

Tseng, W, Y., Chiu, W., & Leng, H. K. (2020). A comparative study of consumers’ intention to purchase counterfeit outdoor products in Taiwan and Hong Kong. Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies, 28(3), 162-176. DOI 10.1108/JABES-02-2020-0011

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

Mardiatmi, B. D., Wikantari, M. A., Pusporini, P., Argo, J. G., & Khoerunisa, M. (2025). Why Consumers Choose Counterfeits: An Integrated Model of Psychological and Social Determinants. Journal of Social Science and Business Studies, 3(4), 623–632. https://doi.org/10.61487/jssbs.v3i4.204

Issue

Section

Articles