Risk Management Implementation for Safeguarding National Food Security and Enhancing Agricultural Productivity through Optimal Absorption of Fertilizer Subsidies in Indonesia

https://doi.org/10.61487/jssbs.v4i2.303

Authors

  • Amir Hamzah Bandung Islamic University
  • Tasya Aspiranti Bandung Islamic University
  • Sri Fadilah Bandung Islamic University

Keywords:

risk management, fertilizer subsidy, food security, agricultural productivity, policy efficiency

Abstract

Fertilizer subsidies remain a central policy instrument for supporting smallholder farmers and stabilizing food production in developing economies. In Indonesia, however, persistent challenges related to targeting accuracy, distribution inefficiencies, fiscal leakages, and environmental risks have limited the effectiveness of fertilizer subsidy programs. This study develops and applies a comprehensive risk management framework to evaluate how optimal absorption of fertilizer subsidies can safeguard national food security while enhancing agricultural productivity. Using a mixed-methods approach that integrates policy risk mapping, institutional analysis, and econometric assessment of productivity outcomes, this paper identifies key operational, financial, governance, and environmental risks embedded in Indonesia’s fertilizer subsidy system. The findings demonstrate that risk-informed subsidy management characterized by improved beneficiary targeting, digitalized distribution controls, adaptive monitoring, and coordinated institutional governance significantly strengthens yield performance, input-use efficiency, and resilience of national food security. This research contributes to the literature by bridging risk management theory with agricultural subsidy policy, offering actionable insights for policymakers seeking to balance productivity growth, fiscal sustainability, and long-term food system resilience.  

References

Anderson, J. R., & Feder, G. (2007). Agricultural extension. In R. Evenson & P. Pingali (Eds.), Handbook of Agricultural Economics (Vol. 3, pp. 2343–2378). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0072(06)03044-1

Dorward, A. (2009). Rethinking agricultural input subsidy programmes in a changing world. Food Policy, 34(2), 172–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2008.12.004

FAO. (2018). The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2018. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

FAO. (2021). World Fertilizer Trends and Outlook to 2022. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Jayne, T. S., Mason, N. M., Burke, W. J., & Ariga, J. (2018). Review: Taking stock of Africa’s second-generation agricultural input subsidy programs. Food Policy, 75, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.01.003

Kassie, M., Jaleta, M., & Mattei, A. (2014). Evaluating the impact of improved maize varieties on food security in rural Tanzania. Food Security, 6(2), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-014-0335-4

World Bank. (2020). Revisiting Agricultural Input Subsidies: Issues and Reform Options. World Bank Group.

World Bank. (2022). Commodity Markets Outlook: The Impact of the War in Ukraine on Commodity Markets. World Bank Group.

Zilberman, D., Khanna, M., & Lipper, L. (2018). Economics of resource management and sustainable agriculture. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 10, 513–534. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100517-023005

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Hamzah, A., Aspiranti , T., & Fadilah , S. (2026). Risk Management Implementation for Safeguarding National Food Security and Enhancing Agricultural Productivity through Optimal Absorption of Fertilizer Subsidies in Indonesia . Journal of Social Science and Business Studies, 4(2), 88–93. https://doi.org/10.61487/jssbs.v4i2.303

Issue

Section

Articles